Friday, December 12, 2014

Oomph 1.0.0 is Available

I'm very happy and a little proud to announce the very first release of Eclipse Oomph. The new installers are now available for your platform:

You can also install Oomph into an existing IDE via the update site or the site archive. Our help center is still work in progress but you may already find answers to your questions there. Our wiki may provide additional information.

This 1.0.0 release includes:

I'd like to thank our committers, especially my friend Ed Merks, our contributors and early users for their great contributions, valuable feedback, and concise bug reports. Working with you has been and will continue to be an absolutely pleasant and rewarding experience for me.

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

When You Change a Method Return Type...

... strange effects can result under certain circumstances! Recently some Oomph users reported mysterious NoSuchMethodErrors at runtime and I spent quite some time to hunt down the problem. What I found is kind of scary. Consider the following, simple program:

  public class Util
  {
    public static void run()
    {
      // Run it...
    }
  }

  public class Main
  {
    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
      Util.run();
    }
  }

The bytecode of the compiled main() method is as simple as:

  invokestatic Util/run()V
  return

Notice the uppercase "V" at the end of the run() method call. It indicates that the return type of the called run() method is "void" and is part of the bytecode of the caller! Now change the declaration of the called run() method to return a boolean value:

  public class Util
  {
    public static boolean run()
    {
      // Run it...
      return true;
    }
  }

  public class Main
  {
    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
      Util.run();
    }
  }

Recompile both classes and look at the bytecode of the main() method again:

  invokestatic Util/run()Z
  pop
  return

Notice that the bytecode has changed even though the source code of the Main class has not changed the least bit. The old run() method with no return type would not be considered a valid call target anymore!

Interesting, but when can this become a real problem?

Well, in our case the calling and the called method are in different OSGi plugins and we use Maven/Tycho to build them and our Oomph users use p2 to install or update them. The following steps turned out to be tragic:

  • I changed the return type of the called method from void to boolean.
  • Maven/Tycho has built both the calling and the called plugin.
    • The called plugin got a new version (build qualifier) because it was really changed.
    • The calling plugin did not get a different version because its source code wasn't changed.
  • A user updated his Oomph installation to the new build.
    • The called plugin was updated because a new version was found.
    • The calling plugin was not updated because there was no new version available. To be clear, there was a plugin with different content in the new build, but it had the same version as in the previous build.
As a result this user was faced with an evil exception at runtime:

  java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: Util.run()V

Now that I know why this happened I can easily fix the nasty problem by applying a fake change to the calling plugin's source code to cause Tycho to assign a new version number to it; one that is consistent with the bytecode of the called plugin.

The fact that this can happen so easily leaves me kind of scared. After all, I'll probably never ever try to change a method return type again.